Why SSDLC must be a key criterion in supply chain evaluations

Topic : information technology | ebooks whitepapers

Why SSDLC must be a key criterion in supply chain evaluations

Supply chain attacks increasingly exploit weaknesses in how software is built, not just how it is deployed. This white paper explains why the Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SSDLC) must be a core criterion in supplier evaluations. From high-profile breaches to evolving regulations, the message is clear: without mature secure development practices, organizations inherit hidden risks that runtime controls and contracts cannot fix.

  • Shift from reactive to preventive security: Embed security across requirements, design, coding, testing, release and maintenance to reduce systemic vulnerabilities.
  • Evaluate suppliers across six SSDLC dimensions: governance, risk management, implementation, verification, release security, and post-release monitoring—supported by evidence and certifications.
  • Align with global standards and regulations: Frameworks such as ISO/IEC 27001, IEC 62443-4-1, NIS 2 and DORA reinforce SSDLC as a baseline for trust.

By integrating SSDLC maturity into procurement and risk management, organizations strengthen resilience, reduce compliance exposure and ensure their supply chain partners deliver security by design—not as an afterthought.

 

Want to learn more?

Submit the form below to Access the Resource